Headshot Placeholder
T.J. Parker
EDGE | Clemson | Class JR | Rank 28
Model Grade 81.48 | Card Grade 7.2 (Depth + Special Teams)
Best Team Fit: ATL
Best Scheme Fit: Multiple Front Pass Rush
Projected Role: Three-down pressure creator
| Player Information | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name: | T.J. Parker | School: | Clemson | Position: | EDGE | Jersey #: |
| Class / Age: | JR / Pending | DOB: | Pending | |||
| Size / Length: | 6-3 | 263 lbs | Arms 33.1 in | Hands 9.5 in | Wingspan Pending in | |||||
| Alignment/Scheme: | Multiple Front Pass Rush | |||||
| Games Watched: | ||||||
| Major Factors: | # | Model, film, production, athletic profile, context. | ||||
| Grading Scale: | 9.2-9.5 Rare/Blue-Chip | 8.8-9.1 Pro Bowl Ceiling | 8.3-8.7 High-End Starter | 7.8-8.2 Quality Starter | 7.3-7.7 Contributor | 6.8-7.2 Depth/ST | 6.3-6.7 Roster Competition | <6.3 Priority FA | |||||
| Athletic + Data Snapshot | ||||||
| Testing Line: | 40 Pending | 10-split Pending | Vert Pending | Broad Pending | Shuttle Pending | 3-Cone Pending | Bench Pending | |||||
| Composite Signals: | RAS 9.34 (Starter>=5.27, Impact>=7.09) | PFF Grade 80.7 | |||||
| Personal/Behavior: | 7.3 | Volatility indicator: No. Verify interviews, accountability, and role acceptance. Model final grade: 81.48 (Round 2-3). | ||||
| Athletic Ability: | 8.6 | Athletic score 89.1; RAS 9.34. | ||||
| Strength & Explosion: | 8.6 | Size score 90.0. Track contact power and force transfer on tape. | ||||
| Competes: | 9.2 | Trait score 95.1; film coverage 0.0; competitive strain projects as translatable. | ||||
| Production: | 8.9 | Production 91.6; Breakout age N/A; Dominator N/A; profile tier N/A. | ||||
| Mental/Learning: | 9.0 | Context score 89.2. Processing and role communication need game-by-game verification. | ||||
| Injury History: | 5.8 | Model risk flag: Manageable. Integrate medical stack once combine/club data is available. | ||||
| Risk + Verification | ||||||
| Medical/Character: | Cross-check with combine medical, interview, and full-season tape cutups before lock. | |||||
| Development Plan: | Year 1: role-specific package + special teams utility where applicable. Year 2: expand responsibility into full-time snaps. | |||||
| Source Confidence: | Medium confidence - model and available film align; pending combine + interview stack. | |||||
| Player Summary | ||||||
Report:T.J. Parker (EDGE, Clemson) holds a model grade of 81.48 with a Round 3-4 projection. Current board slot: 11. developmental contributor profile; produces pressure through get-off and counters. Seed rank 11 indicates current market confidence with developmental upside still available. How He Wins:Role fit: Three-down pressure creator. Preferred usage in multiple_front_pass_rush. Traits: leverage, processing, and role translation remain primary wins. Primary Concerns:Development checkpoints: consistency, role expansion pace, and matchup stress handling. 2025 Production Snapshot:PFF grade 80.7; CFB prod signal 70.12; pressure/pr-snap 0.2389; sacks/pr-snap 0.075; CFB quality proxy (0.42) Board Movement:Kiper board movement unavailable for this player. Role / Scheme Projection:Best early team fit: ATL. Scheme path: multiple_front_pass_rush. Expected early deployment: Three-down pressure creator. Historical combine comp: T.J. Parker (2026), similarity 97.82. Value Range:Floor/Ceiling framework: floor 78.70, ceiling 83.42. Current card band: Depth + Special Teams.
|
||||||